| |
|
America's infatuation with the west is
reflected in this Image by Albert Bierstadt |
BACKGROUND
Between 1800 and 1830, America struggled to deal with the problem of
slavery while beginning the transformation to an industrial society.
It was also a period when the nation significantly expanded its
borders. The states of Ohio, Louisiana, Indiana, Mississippi,
Illinois, Alabama, Maine and Missouri were admitted to the Union and
the Louisiana Purchase further extended the nation’s boundaries to the
Pacific Ocean. Human rights were also expanded. The vote was extended
to citizens who did not own property and, although slavery was still
practiced in the Southern States, it was eliminated in the North. A
number of reform movements surfaced, most were a reaction to a growing
list of new social problems.
first two decades of the 19th century saw a period of economic
growth that was stimulated by budding industrialization, which resulted
from the opportunities, created by a series of wars in Europe.
The Southern States were dramatically altered by the invention of
the cotton gin, an innovation that not only made cotton a major crop
in the Deep South but also expanded the institution of slavery. The
development of the cotton industry led to the development of a North
Eastern textile industry, where women became an important source of
low-wage labor.
|
Slaves To Market-Artist unkown |
America’s cities grew exponentially. The problems associated with
urban growth intensified in proportion to the population increase.
While there were concerns over rising expenses for public welfare
programs, diseases were a more immediate threat. Yellow fever was
rampant throughout the Southern States and malaria a constant problem
in most port cities. Consumption, or tuberculosis, which was easily
spread where population densities were high, was the most feared disease
and was widespread in the poorer quarters. Cities and towns were
regularly visited by epidemics of cholera and smallpox. Living in
cities where sanitation was poor or nonexistent and people lived at
close quarters was dangerous. Mortality rates were high and, a child
born in the city had only a 50% chance of surviving to adulthood.
This
was also America’s first reform age. Emerging social problems provided
a challenge to Americans who were drawn to a religious movement known
as the Second Great Awakening. Missionaries representing this newest
wave of evangelism roamed the streets of Boston, New York, and Philadelphia
in a well meaning but largely unsuccessful attempt to save the laboring
classes from their vices. Reform movements aimed at changing the
individual were essential elements of this religious awakening and
they spread to nearly every aspect of American life.
REAL
PEOPLE
Early 19th century life was a difficult challenge for most
Americans. Poverty hung like a cloud over the lives of both rural
and urban families. Agricultural and industrial work was not only
hard and dangerous but presented recurring economic hardship. These
conditions were exacerbated by attitudes and policies that denied
ordinary people all but the rudest forms of assistance. Regulations
and safety standards were nonexistent and government policies favored
financial and business interests to an extent that would astonish
us today.
Most
Americans continued to live a rural life that was almost feudal.
While land was cheap or even free, most families were able to eke
out only a very low standard of living that hovered close to or below
impoverishment. It was common for families were to share one bed
and one-room houses were the norm. Large families often ate in shifts,
as there was too few chairs for them to all sit together during meals.
Eating implements and tools were considered so valuable that along
with beds and chairs, they were frequently listed as part of an estate.
Fireplaces served a dual purpose since kitchen stoves were uncommon
on farms until mid-century. One flinches when imagining the challenge
of using a fireplace to cook meals for a large family. When illness
or injury brought difficult times farm families turned to relatives
and neighbors for help. Widows often lived with their children; many
households included cousins or uncles and even friends who helped
with chores. Children of poorer farmers were often “sent out” at
a young age to work for a neighbor who needed cheap labor.
Early
industrial employment provided living conditions that were little
improvement over their rural neighbors. Most industries were centered
in small towns and villages rather cities. Industrial work was long
and hard. Earnings were typically based on output rather than hourly
wages. The typical workday was 12 to 15 hours and the workweek was
6 days. A worker’s wages rarely moved working class families far
from poverty. Industrial work was dangerous and work related deaths
and injuries common. While workers endured low wages and work related
injuries, Northern merchants and Southern plantation owners were the
primary recipients of the wealth created by this first wave of industrialism.
One percent of the population owned one-fourth of the nation’s wealth.
The
Native American groups of this period faced not only the threat of
poverty but also extreme hardship that stemmed from harsh and unjust
government policies. The primary strategy for dealing with the problems
presented by Native Americans was to move them westward. In 1790,
most of America’s four million white people lived no more than fifty
miles from the Atlantic Ocean. By 1830, there were 13 million Americans,
and 4 million of them had moved into what had previously been “Indian
lands”. Most of the Native American tribes had allied themselves
with the British during the war of 1812, which provided a justification
for white settlements to intrude into lands that had previously been
set-aside for Native Americans. In the 1820s, those settlements
incited a series of lopsided wars that were concluded with treaties
that were thinly veiled land grabs. By 1825, most Native Americans
had been removed from Alabama and Florida, and settlers had encroached
into Indian lands in Georgia and large parts of Kentucky and South
Carolina. After Andrew Jackson became president in 1828, congress
passed the “Indian Removal Bill” which further accelerated the forced
migration of Native American peoples. In 1800, more than 4 million
Native Americans resided east of the Mississippi river, but by 1840,
there remained fewer than 35 thousand.
|
Trail of Tears by Robert Lindneux |
The invention of the cotton gin and the growth of the textile industry
in the North combined with the removal of Native Americans from much
of the South was a combination that created compelling incentives
for slaveholding. Between 1800 and 1830, the slave population in
the South doubled from one to two million souls. Although the importation
of new slaves was outlawed in 1808, trading slaves who were already
in America continued and was supplemented by smugglers. Slave ownership
was primarily an offshoot of the plantation system, where the ownership
of large numbers of slaves created an economic advantage. Large numbers
of slaves represented a considerable investment of capital that only
large and affluent landowners could afford. Only a third of Southern
white households included slaves and one percent of Southern landowners
owned more than a quarter of all slaves.
Slavery was extremely oppressive. While some slaves were humanely
treated, few were provided a standard of living above poverty. Slave
quarters were minimal and nutrition was limited to what was required
in order to perform heavy labor. A slave child born in the Deep South
had less than a 50% chance of living to adulthood. Family life was
difficult. Only half of slave families were composed of 2 adults,
and children were often sold before they attainted maturity. Miscegenation
was common and reflected the attitude that the slave owners even owned
the slave’s sexuality. The system’s brutality was reflected in the
so-called “black codes”, laws governing slaves that were common throughout
the South. For example:
More than 7 slaves found traveling without their master—20 lashes
For traveling without a pass- 20 lashes
For hunting with dogs-30 lashes
Punishment
for more serious crimes, especially attempted escape, would normally
include branding, and many lashes. Repeat offenders often faced amputation.
In early America, women often enjoyed a degree of equality that they
would lose as the nation began to industrialize. Rural
life required women to manage the household, supervise the family’s
general medical care and the children’s education. After the Revolution,
there was even some discussion of giving women the vote. In cities
and towns workingwomen were usually relegated to domestic service
where they were often considered members of the respective households.
By 182o attitudes had begun to change, particularly in manufacturing
regions. Northern industrialists regarded women as a source of cheap
labor for the newly emerging textile industry. The “Lowell girls”,
young women hired to work the mills in Lowell, Massachusetts, became
a major labor source for early American industries in search of low-wage
workers. Although the so-called “Lowell experiment” was initiated
with promises from employers of good working conditions, the working
environments in the textile mills quickly deteriorated and, by the
late 1820s, women workers were organizing one of the first industrial
strikes in America.
POLICIES
FOR THE INDIGENT
While most Americans struggled to maintain a subsistence standard
of living, extreme poverty became more common. The war of 1812 gave
an impetus to industrial development, creating new industries in cities
and small towns, but after the war of 1812 and the wars in Europe
ended, the American economy suffered a serious downturn. The first
major American depression (1816) brought hard times to most American
cities. Relief programs were swamped and soup kitchens sprang up
in all the urban areas. New York City officials estimated that more
than 20 percent of the population was receiving some form of assistance.
Periodic economic depressions became a feature of the nation’s economy.
Not only did thousands of urban Americans find themselves periodically
forced to depend of relief, thousands of small businessmen and farmers
found themselves in debtors’ prison. In 1830 there were more than
ten thousand people incarcerated in New York City’s debtors’ prison,
this at a time when the total population of the city was less than
150 thousand souls. More than half were there for debts of less than
25 dollars.
Taxes
soared. Cities found it difficult to maintain programs for both the
indigent and for the unemployed workers. Critics of charity claimed
that the benevolent impulses of do-gooders were creating a permanent
class of paupers, and officials began making a distinction between
“the poor” and “paupers”. The poor included the majority of city
dwellers whenever times turned bad; paupers were people who had descended
into a lifestyle of poverty and were permanently dependent on charity.
City leaders, who were mostly responsible for the very poor, searched
for ways to control their growth. Committees were created to investigate.
By
the 1820s two schools of thought had emerged. One school pointed
the finger of blame at the individual behaviors of the very poor.
One committee claimed to have found that a majority of the poor had
“fallen on evil ways”. A second school viewed economic conditions
as the root of the problem. This systemic theory enjoyed enough popularity
that, in 1817, the U.S. congress passed a bill creating funds for
public works projects. However, President Madison vetoed the bill.
Today it is almost beyond comprehension that, at a time when fewer
than three hundred people worked for the federal government and more
than a hundred years before the passage of the social security act,
there was such powerful support for a national welfare program.
|
MAKING CIDER-- WILLIAM MOUNT |
By
the end of the 1820s, most state governments had concluded that the
best solution to the problem of poverty was the elimination of outdoor
relief. This solution was reflected a number of state committee investigations;
the most influential of these was New York’s Yate’s Commission Report.
Poorhouses were the solution. Initially, these new poverty institutions
were seen as institutions where the problems of poverty could be studied,
analyzed and where the poor could then be reformed. Indoor relief,
or the building of institutions to house the very poor (Poorhouses),
was also advanced as a solution to the related problems of crime and
of wayward and abandoned children. Cities and counties soon discovered
that building and maintaining those institutions was an expensive
proposition. Furthermore, merging such disparate groups as widows,
children, the handicapped, and petty criminals posed insurmountable
management problems. Poorhouses, initially established as a largely
humanitarian reform, quickly disintegrated into public embarrassments
that were difficult to manage and even more challenging to fund adequately.
Predictably, most low income Americans used a variety of strategies
to avoid the poorhouse; turning to relatives, neighbors and the newly
emerging friendly societies when times were bad and resorting to public
relief when they had exhausted alternate resources.
DEFIANCE
As
a majority of Americans began to chafe under the policies that they
found oppressive, they began to coalesce into groups that defied the
politics and elites responsible. Groups employed unique strategies
as they attempted to find some relief. The major anti-poverty strategy
pursued by rural white Americans was to demand land policies that
would give them access to cheap or free land in the western territories.
|
Fur Traders- George Bingham |
This
tactic was quite successful, but unfortunately this was at the expense
of the Native American population. Urban workers were less successful.
Demands for a 10-hour day, higher wages, and less punitive responses
to unemployment were stifled. For the much of the nation’s first
50 years, debtors prisons were a hated part of life for American workers
and small businessmen. It was common for people to be incarcerated
for debts under 5 dollars. In 1808 New York City officials estimated
that more than 1,200 people were in debtor’s prison for owing less
than 25 dollars. In 1830 more than 10 thousand debtors were in incarcerated
for debts throughout the state. In Pennsylvania, between 1822 and
1830 more than 6 thousand people were released from debtor’s prisons,
almost half owed less than 10 dollars. By the late 1830s few states
were continuing to use incarceration as a punishment for debtors.
The most militant group of workers during this period was those who
were building the nation’s first canal systems. The difficulties and
dangers of the work spawned scores of strikes. Political strategies
produced some modest gains. The major successes were suffrage and
the elimination of debtors’ prisons. By 1830 most states allowed
all white men to vote and by the late 1830’s most states had discontinued
the use of debtors’ prisons.
Native
Americans fiercely resisted the intrusion of white settlers into lands
that had been promised to them in one of the early treaties. There
were scores of skirmishes and dozens of small wars. The most notable
resistance to white expansion into Indian lands was the war organized
and led by Tecumseh. Tecumseh, a Shawnee chief, convinced members
of more than 32 tribes to join in the fight against the white invasion.
The most famous battle was at Tippecanoe in 1811 where General Henry
Harrison defeated the Indian alliance. Tecumseh was killed in battle
the following year. Other wars followed. Andrew Jackson became famous
for his campaigns against the Native American population in Alabama,
Georgia, and Florida. In 1813-14, Jackson succeeded in pushing the
Creeks out of most of Georgia and Alabama. He then entered into a
series of battles with the Seminoles in Florida and in 1820 forced
the Choctaws to move from Mississippi to Oklahoma.
Resistance
by American slaves took a number of paths. The most obvious was escape.
In spite of the dire consequences that could lead to amputation, whippings,
and even death, thousands of slaves tried to escape. Outright rebellion
was less popular but was more feared. Historians have been able to
identify hundreds of slave revolts. Although none were successful,
they did intimidate the plantation owners, who must have lived in
constant fear that their slaves would someday kill them in their sleep.
Of the hundreds of revolts, the most frightening to this era’s slave
holders were the rebellions led by Gabriel Prosser in 1800 and Denmark
Vesey in 1822.
Prosser organized a conspiracy in Virginia that eventually included
several thousand slaves. The plan was to capture the local armory,
execute local white slave owners, and join the local Indian tribes
in a war against white people. Informers crushed the insurrection
before it could spread and local authorities arrested Prosser, hanging
him and more than 30 of his fellow conspirators.
In
1822, Denmark Vesey hatched a complex and alarming rebellion in South
Carolina. A freedman himself, Vesey organized several thousand slaves
and a handful of poor whites to attack Charleston. Informers thwarted
the revolt, but the incident spread fear throughout the South not
only provoking harsh measures against slaves but also spawning policies
that were designed to separate freedmen and poor whites from the slave
population. Southern elites were well aware of the potential dangers
represented by an alliance between poor whites and slaves.
|
|